文献检索

查找使用阿拉丁产品的科研文献

检索与阿拉丁产品相关的同行评审论文、DOI、PubMed 编号、期刊、作者、CAS 号及研究领域。

科研影响力快照

与阿拉丁产品相关的已发表科研成果

在搜索之前,这些指标可帮助访客快速了解产品关联科研的规模与质量。

346,364+ SCI 论文 与阿拉丁产品引用相关
2,295,288.15 总影响因子 匹配文献记录中影响因子的总和
81.20 最高期刊影响因子 匹配期刊中的最高 IF
6.63 平均期刊影响因子 匹配文献的平均 IF

参考指标 指标基于阿拉丁文献引用数据库及期刊影响因子记录。文献关联仅供科研参考,请以原始文献为准。

热门产品

视图 列表 网格

1 项目

设置提升方向
投标者
Buildings · 2021 ·Vol. 11 ·期 8 ·363 · IF 2.648

A Social Network-Based Examination on Bid Riggers’ Relationships in the Construction Industry: A Case Study of China

Liang Xiao,Kunhui Ye,Junhong Zhou,Xiaoting Ye,Ramadhani Said Tekka

Collusive bidding has been an insidious issue in the construction industry. Bidders initiate collusive networks of various sizes to win market shares. The popularity of collusive bidding networks affects market fairness and erodes the interests of market players. Although considerable research efforts were made to diagnose collusive bidding networks, there remains a gap in knowledge regarding the relationships bid riggers use to engage in the networks. Therefore, this study used the social network method, where two hundred sixteen collusion cases were collected from China to test these relationships. The results show that collusive bidding networks were characterized by sparseness, a small scale, a high concentration, and strong randomness. Three types of collusive bidding networks were also detected: contractual, spontaneous, and shadow. Furthermore, these collusive bidding networks had discrepancies regarding participants’ identities, forms of collusive bids, and the determination of bid winners. It was found that the proposed social network model of deliberating bid riggers’ relationships lays a solid foundation for the detection of collusive bidding in the construction sector.

研究领域: 管理科学 · 建筑工程 · 产业经济学 · 反垄断监管 · 社会治理
✓ 已验证 DOI 高影响因子
查看原文 查看 PubMed
已复制

文献关联基于可获得的产品、CAS、DOI 及引用记录。收录不代表作者或出版方对阿拉丁产品的背书,请以原始文献为准。