文献检索

查找使用阿拉丁产品的科研文献

检索与阿拉丁产品相关的同行评审论文、DOI、PubMed 编号、期刊、作者、CAS 号及研究领域。

科研影响力快照

与阿拉丁产品相关的已发表科研成果

在搜索之前,这些指标可帮助访客快速了解产品关联科研的规模与质量。

346,364+ SCI 论文 与阿拉丁产品引用相关
2,295,288.15 总影响因子 匹配文献记录中影响因子的总和
81.20 最高期刊影响因子 匹配期刊中的最高 IF
6.63 平均期刊影响因子 匹配文献的平均 IF

参考指标 指标基于阿拉丁文献引用数据库及期刊影响因子记录。文献关联仅供科研参考,请以原始文献为准。

热门产品

视图 列表 网格

2 项

设置提升方向
纳莫司他
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS · 2024 · IF 1.8

Design, synthesis, anti-trypsin and anti-inflammatory evaluation of new guanidinobenzoic acid ester derivatives

Xin-Hao Hua,Fa-Qi Wang,Zhong-Jin Yang,Yuan Liu,Shu-Han Yang,Dong-Rong Zhu,Yu-Ming Liu

Herein, we designed a series of guanidinobenzoic acid ester derivatives on the basis of approved AP drugs, such as nafamostat, gabexate and camostat, and evaluated their inhibitory effects on trypsin and anti-inflammatory activity. Among them, five compounds (6a, 6c–6e, 7j) showed excellent inhibitory effects on trypsin with IC50 values of 0.0756 μM to 0.1227 μM, which are more potent than nafamostat and gabexate. Moreover, compounds 6a, 6b and 6c also showed significant inhibitory potency against the pro-inflammatory molecule NO with IC50 values of 1.618 μM, 2.276 μM, and 3.022 μM, respectively. Consequently, the potential lead compounds simultaneously with anti-trypsin and anti-inflammatory activities were identified, which would profit further structural optimization for the treatment of AP.

CAS / MDL: 81525-10-2
研究领域: 药物化学 · 炎症研究 · 消化系统疾病
✓ 已验证 产品关联 DOI 高影响因子
查看原文 查看 PubMed
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY · 2013 ·Vol. 49 ·期 3 ·388-399 · IF 3.788

Pharmacologic prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: protease inhibitors and NSAIDs in a meta-analysis

Yuhara Hiroki,Ogawa Masami,Kawaguchi Yoshiaki,Igarashi Muneki,Shimosegawa Tooru,Mine Tetsuya

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis is the most frequent complication of ERCP. Several meta-analyses have examined the effects of protease inhibitors (gabexate mesilate, ulinastatin, and nafamostat mesilate) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on post-ERCP pancreatitis, but the results have been confusing. Since the previous meta-analysis, several new studies have been published on this topic. To provide an updated quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of protease inhibitors and NSAIDs in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials for patients at risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Twenty-six articles were included in this meta-analysis. Nafamostat mesilate (summary RR = 0.41; 95 %CI 0.28–0.59; n  = 4 studies) and NSAIDs (summary RR = 0.58; 95 %CI = 0.44–0.76; n  = 7 studies) were associated with decreased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the high-quality studies. However, gabexate mesilate (summary RR = 0.64; 95 %CI = 0.36–1.13; n  = 6 studies) and ulinastatin (summary RR = 0.65; 95 %CI = 0.33–1.30; n  = 2 studies) were not associated with decreased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the high-quality studies. This is the first meta-analysis to compare the effects of three protease inhibitors. Solid evidence supports the use of nafamostat mesilate and NSAIDs for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis.

研究领域: 消化病学 · 介入内镜学 · 胰腺疾病 · 临床药理学 · 循证医学 · 围手术期管理
✓ 已验证 DOI 高影响因子
查看原文 查看 PubMed
已复制

文献关联基于可获得的产品、CAS、DOI 及引用记录。收录不代表作者或出版方对阿拉丁产品的背书,请以原始文献为准。