Nrf1 (encoded by Nfe2l1 ) and Nrf2 (encoded by Nfe2l2 ), as two key members of the CNC-bZIP transcription factor, exhibit significant functional differences in their pathophysiology. Our previous findings demonstrated that loss of Nrf1α (i.e., a full-length isoform of Nrf1) promotes HepG2-derived tumor growth in xenograft mice, but malgrowth of the xenograft tumor is significantly suppressed by knockout of Nrf2. To gain insights into the mechanism underlying such marked distinctions in their pathologic phenotypes, we mined transcriptome data from liver cancer in the TCGA database to establish a prognostic model and calculate predicted risk scores for each cell line. The results revealed that knockout of Nrf1α markedly increased the risk score in HepG2 cells, whereas the risk score was reduced by knockout of Nrf2. Notably, stanniocalcin 2 (STC2), a biomarker associated with liver cancer, that is upexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues with a reduction in the overall survival ratio of those patients. We observed increased expression levels of STC2 in Nrf1α −/− cells but decreased expression in Nrf2 −/− cells. These findings suggested that STC2 may play a role in mediating the distinction between Nrf1α −/− and Nrf2 −/− . Such potential function of STC2 was further corroborated through a series of experiments combined with transcriptomic sequencing. The results revealed that STC2 functions as a dominant tumor-promoter, because the STC2-leading increases in clonogenicity of hepatoma cells and malgrowth of relevant xenograft tumor were almost completely abolished in STC2 −/− cells. Together, these demonstrate that STC2 could be paved as a potential therapeutic target, albeit as a diagnostic marker, for HCC.
Cisplatin ( cis -Dichlorodiamineplatinum[II], CDDP) is generally accepted as a platinum-based alkylating agent type of the DNA-damaging anticancer drug, which is widely administrated in clinical treatment of many solid tumors . The pharmacological effect of CDDP is mainly achieved by replacing the chloride ion ( Cl − ) in its structure with H 2 O to form active substances with the strong electrophilic properties and then react with any nucleophilic molecules, primarily leading to genomic DNA damage and subsequent cell death. In this process, those target genes driven by the consensus electrophilic and/or antioxidant response elements (EpREs/AREs) in their promoter regions are also activated or repressed by CDDP. Thereby, we here examined the expression profiling of such genes regulated by two principal antioxidant transcription factors Nrf1 and Nrf2 (both encoded by Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2, respectively) in diverse cellular signaling responses to this intervention. The results demonstrated distinct cellular metabolisms, molecular pathways and signaling response mechanisms by which Nrf1 and Nrf2 as the drug targets differentially contribute to the anticancer efficacy of CDDP on hepatoma cells and xenograft tumor mice. Interestingly, the role of Nrf1, rather than Nrf2, is required for the anticancer effect of CDDP, to suppress malignant behavior of HepG2 cells by differentially monitoring multi-hierarchical signaling to gene regulatory networks . To our surprise, it was found there exists a closer relationship of Nrf1α than Nrf2 with DNA repair , but the hyperactive Nrf2 in Nrf1α –∕– cells manifests a strong correlation with its resistance to CDDP, albeit their mechanistic details remain elusive.
危险品化学品经营许可证（带存储）